Andre De Castro

Re: Venezuela it’s different this time. What has happened: - January 3: Capture the president - January 6: Announce U.S. will “run” oil sector indefinitely - January 9: Sign Executive Order shielding revenues from all creditors - January 14: Complete first $500 million sale What’s been said: - CVX: were doubling our production from the current 240k/day level. - XOM: VZ is uninvestible. What’s next? - Reinvestment of some of the $500 MM of revenue. - that’s at least possible since the creditors are on hold. - Solves the problem for an OFS company if they are hired on how they get paid, and that’s important. Yes, VZ is still a riskier investment than other options for many oil companies and they’ve been burned in the past, assets nationalized/stolen. And now, some of that uncertainty, how to get paid, has some clarity. It’s a bit more palatable to invest in VZ and see how one gets their money out. Yes, there are still in country governance and security issues, but once the oil is seaborne, there is a higher visibility to actually getting paid from the Doha accounts. After all the U.S. is in charge now, Chris Wright It’s a step in the right direction for increased production and investment. Not expecting big dollars, but more adventurous investors might be enticed…and this is an industry of wildcatters. And when there is an attractive return or an early mover advantage to be had, memory’s might be short. Happy Hunting

1

1 Comment

"Financial Tokenization" Evangelists Promise to Revolutionize Efficiencies, Create New Markets, Boost Liquidity and Democratize Access — Don’t Believe Them. As expert technologist Stephen Diehl explains in yet another objective/independent blockchain exposé (see also concerned.tech), financial tokenization promoters promise the moon, projecting an innovative, tech-savvy image. But it’s all subterfuge, chicanery and charade. First off, it's axiomatic that critical real-world assets require trusted 3rd party custodians and, blockchain, an immutable spreadsheet, is not capable of serving as the ultimate arbiter of legal truth. The finality of asset ownership remains firmly rooted in traditional legal systems, not in a database. As Diehl wryly notes: “If courts can unilaterally force updates to this supposedly "immutable" and "decentralized" ledger through legal authority, then we've simply recreated a traditional spreadsheet with extra steps and overhead. The blockchain adds no meaningful value - it's just a more complex and inefficient way to store the same data that must ultimately bend to real-world legal authority.” https://lnkd.in/eVK-HWs5 Second, tokenization is just a catchphrase and blockchain is just a database. IMHO, neither can deliver any tangible, sustainable or meaningful benefit. This is why the greatest database firms in the world — Oracle, Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Apple — have devoted little, if any, resources to blockchain/tokenization development (just listen to their earnings calls). Third, some Stark advice: 1.    Don’t Follow the Horde. Seek expert/objective/independent sources. Unfortunately, the vast majority of those shilling tokenization elixir are promoters and hired hands, who are heavily invested in the very same blockchain and tokenization products that they tout as the next big thing. 2.    If You Don’t Get It, Don’t Get It. Don’t be deterred by the Big Crypto playbook’s typical retorts of: “You just don’t get it.” “You need to get educated.” “You need to do the research.” “OK Boomer.” And the list goes on. When all other arguments fail, tokenization advocates will often pivot to this clever Emperor’s New Clothes modus operandi. The hope is that we will all become too afraid to admit that there is nothing to get. 3.    What If It All Vanished Tomorrow. Ask tokenization promoters to provide solid examples of how blockchain benefits people. N. B. that the complexity, opaqueness and aspirational hype of their answer is not a sign of sophistication -- it’s a glaring “Theranosian” red flag. 4.    Show Me The Money. Ask this question of any independent technologist: “If blockchain disappeared tomorrow, would anyone even notice? The answer will be a resounding and definitive “No.” Beyond being a rather awkward, arguably antiquated and extremely inefficient 20-year old database technology, blockchain is remarkably unremarkable, facilitating a financial tokenization that mostly makes products and services worse.

68

45 Comments

Crypto Reset – Real Plan or Sci-Fi Movie? So there’s this rumor going around. A top advisor to Russian President Putin, Andrey Kobyakov, claims the U.S. has a wild plan: use stablecoins (a type of digital money) to wipe out its insane $35 trillion debt. The Crazy Theory: The idea is that the U.S. would create a new digital dollar, tie it to its debt, and then on purpose crush the value of that coin. Boom—instant “we don’t owe you anymore,” but without officially saying “we default.” Basically, press reset and start fresh. The Harsh Reality: Sounds like a thriller movie, right? In real life, it would be a total disaster: Global Meltdown: U.S. debt is the backbone of the world economy. If America played this game, the dollar would crash, banks would fail, and markets everywhere would explode. Trust = Gone Forever: Nobody would ever lend money to the U.S. again. Not countries, not companies, not even your grandma. Super Inflation: Crushing the coin’s value would be like printing trillions of dollars overnight. Prices would skyrocket, and your savings? Poof, gone. So What Can Regular People Do? Even if this whole “reset” idea is far-fetched, it’s a reminder to be smart with money: 1. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket (the dollar): Keep some money in other currencies like the Euro or Swiss Franc. 2. Own real stuff: Gold, silver, land—things that don’t vanish when paper money does. 3. Think global: Invest in companies that make money all over the world, not just in the U.S. 4. Try safe-haven assets: Some people even call Bitcoin “digital gold.” Bottom line: This “crypto reset” theory feels more like a Hollywood script than a real plan. But it’s still a good reminder: the world can surprise us, so it’s smart to stay prepared. What do you think? Could the U.S. actually pull off something this wild, or is it just a funny conspiracy story?

4

Crypto founders asked for the banks. Here’s the list. 📄 US / US-Accessible • Custodia Bank • Cross River Bank • Mercury • Evolve Bank & Trust • Old Glory Bank • FV Bank • Quaint Oak Bank • CBi Bank • First American Bank • Republic Bank of Chicago • U.S. Bank International / Regulated Crypto Banks • Sygnum Bank • SEBA Bank (AMINA) • Swissquote • Bank Frick Emerging / Charter-Focused Crypto Banks • Crypto.com Trust Bank • Bridge (Stripe crypto trust bank initiative) • Erebor Bank Not every one of these will onboard every MSB. Not every “crypto-friendly” bank is MSB-friendly. But if you’re building in crypto and don’t recognize most of these names, you’re not thinking about infrastructure seriously enough. Banking isn’t optional. It’s survival. You can take that to the bank 🏦

1

2 Comments

There's been a lot of discussion lately about the "AI bubble" and a fair share of skeptics have questioned the usefulness of injecting AI into literally everything. I can't speak for other verticals -- but for the OSINT industry specifically, AI certainly has the ability to be game-changing. At Cloudburst Technologies, we encourage our staff to utilize AI tools in their daily operations with everything from product design to marketing. Recent advances in AI video generation allow our builders and sales reps to create their own engaging product messaging in seconds and without any real technical expertise.

13