Luke Donavan

👀 TA industry, take note — the 2025 TAtech Edition of Insights@Work from Aspect43 is packed with insights and data for anyone trying to sell into or build for the TA space. The report highlights a major truth: the problem in hiring isn't volume. Its value. 🧩 Recruiters need help solving alignment issues — like adjacent skills, pay expectations, and internal mobility — not just another automation tool. 💸 Budgets aren’t gone. But buyers need real support to justify them to leadership. 📉 Most tech is underutilized — not because it’s bad, but because it’s not clearly positioned or supported post-sale. 📦 All-in-one HR suites are winning by default. Point solutions must show unique, strategic value and integrate cleanly. The future of TA tech? Stop automating broken processes. Start solving real problems. Big props to Aspect43 for another crystal-clear breakdown of what TA buyers actually want. 🙌 🔗 Read the full report if you're a TAtech member. #TalentAcquisition #HRTech #TAtech #Recruiting #Aspect43 #HiringInnovation #ProductStrategy #WorkTech

8

1 Comment

🔍 Why Searching Directly on Job Boards Finds Better Candidates Than Using Aggregated API Searches In today’s fast-paced recruiting landscape, automation is essential—but not all automation delivers the same value. If your recruiting team is relying on aggregated API searches provided by job boards, you might be leaving high-quality candidates on the table. Here’s why searching directly within a job board’s native platform yields more relevant candidates than consolidated or API-based searches. 🧠 1. Native Search Algorithms Are Smarter (and Evolving Faster) Each job board (like Dice, Monster, CareerBuilder, or Indeed) invests heavily in fine-tuning its internal search engine. These platforms continuously optimize results using proprietary algorithms that factor in: Search behavior patterns - Resume freshness and engagement metrics - Keyword-context matching - Real-time profile activity When using a job board’s own UI, you benefit from all of this. But when accessing resumes via an API, you get a watered-down, generalized dataset—often lacking these contextual layers. 🔍 2. APIs Are Limited by Design While APIs are convenient, they’re built for interoperability, not discovery. APIs usually provide only a subset of candidate data due to privacy and performance constraints. Resume parsing and keyword matching are simplified—meaning relevance scores and rank ordering are often lost. Real-time results can lag or get cached, showing outdated or less-engaged candidates. In contrast, direct search taps into the most current and complete candidate pool—with richer filtering and sorting options. 🎯 3. Better Boolean, Filters, and Relevance Controls When your recruiters use the job board interface directly, they can: Customize Boolean strings with more precision - Use advanced filters (by skills, titles, locations, work authorization, etc.) - Dynamically adjust queries based on instant feedback from results APIs may expose some filters—but rarely all. That missing granularity leads to broader, less useful results. 💬 4. You Miss Platform-Specific “Signals” Certain platforms reward interaction: - Viewed profiles bubble to the top - Recent activity signals higher intent Premium filters help surface passive but highly qualified candidates These nuanced cues rarely get exposed through an API—and they make all the difference in fast-paced recruiting. ✅ The Bottom Line If your recruiting workflow relies solely on aggregated search APIs, you’re likely getting quantity over quality. For strategic roles or urgent openings, direct platform search consistently delivers more targeted, up-to-date, and actionable results.

5

🚀 TA Leaders: Your hiring plan math is probably wrong 🚀 I just launched the TA Team Capacity Planner - a comprehensive tool that actually calculates whether your team can deliver on business hiring goals. What the TA Team Capacity Planner does: ✅ Period-adjusted capacity planning (3-12 months) with automatic recalculation ✅ Department-level hiring analysis with smart replacement hire distribution ✅ AI impact modeling - quantify how your tech stack boosts efficiency ✅ Support role optimization - model efficiency gains from support roles ✅ Dashboard with key metrics and gap analysis ✅ Professional exports - comprehensive analysis + downloads ✅ Scenario planning with strategic team composition recommendations Perfect for: 🎯 TA Managers, Directors & VPs building realistic hiring plans and team budgets 🎯 Companies with 50-1,000 employees scaling their TA function 🎯 Organizations with dedicated TA teams (3+ recruiters) 🎯 Growing companies needing data-driven capacity vs. demand analysis 🎯 TA Leaders who need to justify headcount requests with solid math Ideal scenarios: Leadership asks: "Can we hire 100 people next quarter?" (Now you'll know!) You're implementing AI tools and want to model ROI impact Your team is overwhelmed but you need data to prove it You're building annual TA budgets and team structure plans You manage hiring across multiple departments with varying difficulty Real-world example: Input your team structure → TA Team Capacity Planner calculates you can handle 180 hires/year → Business wants 250 → Gap analysis shows you need 2 more recruiters + 1 sourcer → Export the summary → Present to leadership with confidence Beta testing opportunity! 🤝 This is production-ready with comprehensive functionality, but I want TA experts to: Stress test with your real hiring scenarios Validate the AI efficiency assumptions against your experience Challenge the capacity calculations with edge cases Share feedback on the reporting features What you get: Free access to a sophisticated planning tool Direct input on refinements and new features Analysis you can actually present to leadership Ready to replace your TA capacity guesswork with actual math? Try it: https://lnkd.in/ekaVxX_F Drop a comment with your biggest capacity planning challenge, or DM me after you've tested it with your real numbers! Fair warning: You might discover you need more resources than you thought... but now you'll have the data to prove it 📊 #TalentAcquisition #TALeadership #CapacityPlanning #WorkforcePlanning #TAOperations #AIinRecruiting #BetaTesting

3

1 Comment

AI is becoming table stakes in recruiting — sourcing, screening, scheduling, matching. But speed isn’t the problem hiring teams are trying to solve right now. Quality, consistency, and regret are. When AI is introduced without clear role definition, decision criteria, and leadership accountability, it amplifies noise instead of reducing it. Technology doesn’t fix unclear thinking. It exposes it. The organizations that will win aren’t those that automate hiring the most — they’re the ones that combine AI efficiency with human accountability, clarity, and intent. Speed gets attention. Judgment builds teams that last.

28

4 Comments

The smartest recruiting teams aren't rushing into AI - they're building the right foundation first. I had our Chief Product Officer Eric Connors to get his perspective on AI adoption in recruiting. Eric outlined four foundational pillars of ethical AI that iCIMS created that guides our technology decisions. The connection between AI governance and privacy protection is becoming table stakes for responsible hiring. The companies getting AI right aren't necessarily the fastest adopters. They're the ones asking the right questions upfront and building sustainable practices that will serve them long-term. Here's a clip from the episode but I'll drop the full link in the comments! Our Fireside Chat series is designed to give you a power packed, 20 minute or less video on the hottest topics, led by the best experts in the field. Be sure to subscribe to the playlist so you stay on top of the current events in the industry!

36

5 Comments

Ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati's AI startup Thinking Machines Lab officially closed a $2B seed round led by Andreessen Horowitz, with participation from Nvidia, Accel, ServiceNow, CISCO, AMD, and Jane Street. With billions in funding, Murati may have enough of a war chest to train frontier AI models, but Thinking Machines Lab has an uphill battle to catch up with other AI labs. It’s likely banking on novel research breakthroughs to set it apart; however, that’s an increasingly difficult task as Meta, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, and OpenAI invest billions in their own research teams. https://lnkd.in/gYfEUxQy

41

Twilio's SVP of Strategy & Operations, Ivy Grant, shares insights on reimagining AI approaches in InformationWeek. She discusses starting with friction points rather than function, the importance of dual-speed implementation, and creating flywheels of acceleration for meaningful AI transformation. 👇

2

Humans and AI, not humans vs. AI. Agentic AI is no longer a sidekick. It is becoming a teammate. That shift reframes everything about how we think about staffing, recruitment, and talent strategy. As John Winsor writes in Forbes, AI agents can now schedule interviews, update records, screen candidates, and even interact directly with candidates. The opportunity is not to replace recruiters but to evolve their role into orchestrating hybrid teams of human and digital talent. The upside is real. Research shows human teams augmented by AI are already faster and more effective. But so is the responsibility. Governance, adoption, and trust matter as much as efficiency. For HR, Talent, and L&D leaders, the challenge is clear: 🔹 How do we upskill employees to confidently partner with AI teammates? 🔹 How do we evolve recruiters and managers into strategic orchestrators of hybrid teams? 🔹 How do we ensure adoption, trust, and measurable outcomes stay at the center? 🔹 And how do we double down on human capabilities: judgment, adaptability, and connection, that AI cannot replace? The future of talent acquisition is here. It is not humans vs. machines. It is humans and AI, working together better than either could alone. Link to article: https://lnkd.in/giuQmEjE #AIinHR #FutureOfWork #TalentStrategy #AgenticAI #HRInnovation #LearningAndDevelopment

10

5 Comments

TA Head: We should get a 3rd party AI Interviewing tool. It’ll solve our first-mile screening bottleneck. Great idea. Wrong alignment !! This proposal should be coming from the CTO, not the TA Head. Why? Because if the CTO isn't the sponsor, the TA Head is about to enter a world of pain: 1) Finding vendors and sitting through 20 discovery calls. 2) Lining up pilots and analyzing "success metrics." Only for the CTO to say: "Nah, we’ll build this internally," or "Their stack doesn't align with our global security architecture." Sound familiar? In 2026, TA Heads shouldn't be the front-runners for a race that wasn't theirs to run. The real role of a TA Leader in tech transformation is to be the Quality Control, not the Procurement Officer. TA should be at the table to grill vendors on: Knowledge Capability: How does the interview transcription actually handle the Indian accent/context? Hallucination Guardrails: What happens when the bot invents a candidate's skill? Bias Frameworks: Is the model trained on niche industry data or just generic internet scrapings? If you're a TA Head trying to "sell" a tech tool to your own leadership, stop. Get your CTO to sponsor the architecture, so you can focus on the talent logic. Stuck in a pilot that’s going nowhere? #hrtransformation #hiring #talentacquisition #hrtech #hrconsulting #peopleadvisory #GCC's

16

3 Comments

AI is changing what creates value. Rewards have to change with it. For years, many reward systems optimized for things that were easy to measure, but not always what mattered most. Compensation was influenced by: Headcount growth - size and scale as a proxy for impact Role accumulation and scope inflation - bigger title and team Tenure - increases tied more to time served than value created Activity over impact - motion mistaken for contribution AI breaks that model. When technology accelerates learning and amplifies judgment, value concentrates and fewer people can do more. That forces a different set of questions: What does impact really look like now? Which roles and contributions actually scale the enterprise? How do rewards reinforce the organization we’re trying to become? With less people driving greater impact, what's the impact on pay? Together with Angel Franklin, we are considering the implications. Curious how others are thinking about this shift. #AI #HR #HubSpot #Hybrid #People #TotalReward

143

19 Comments