Xerxes Irani

The future of design isn't prettier pixels—it's intelligence architecture. Suff Syed's latest piece challenges everything we know: designers must move from the surface to the substrate—from interfaces to the intelligence layer beneath. We've spent careers perfecting visual design, following leaders like Jony Ive. However, in the Era of Intelligence, we need to look toward different leaders—such as Demis Hassabis—who design systems that think, not just look beautiful. Here's the shift: The skills that got us here are no longer sufficient. As AI becomes the new operating system, designers who understand agentic AI, proactive systems, and personal intelligence will shape the next decade. Why now: 96% of designers are self-teaching AI skills. Startups are adopting AI at twice the rate of enterprises. The window to become an outlier is closing. This isn't about AI replacing designers—it's about designers who understand AI replacing those who don't. My challenge: Stop treating AI as just another tool. Start learning how these systems work intimately. Move from decorating surfaces to architecting intelligence. Read Suff's full article: https://lnkd.in/dtfG4dGn Will you be designing with AI or watching from the sidelines? #Design #AI #UXDesign #ProductDesign #DesignLeadership

20

1 Comment

This is a fascinating look at how AI is reshaping the way we design and build. Our workflows, and the relationship between design and code are evolving quickly. Jenny Wen explores what this shift means and how we can adapt to what’s ahead.

6

This pretty accurately describes how I approached working with LLMs this year. The secret is to treat LLMs like a team mate who you want to collaborate with. Provide context . Be thoughtful in scope. Build great documentation and planning. https://lnkd.in/ekBbbiND

19

1 Comment

Most designers say they want impact. What they really want is proof. At scale, I had to formalize proof. I once built a quarterly UX strategy using Jared Spool's Persuasive Metrics to connect design decisions to revenue. A 2% reduction in onboarding friction translated into six figures in retained revenue. That was the language the room spoke. Dashboards. Quarterly reviews. Attribution models. Impact had to be quantified before it was believed. Now I’m at a tiny startup. Last week, a customer Slacked: “Magemetrics saves me days on campaign reports.” Following the rebrand, a prospect opened the site and said: “Okay. This feels serious.” These calls felt different: less explaining, fewer objections, more trust. No attribution model. No presentation. Just behavior changing in real time. Here’s what’s different: In enterprise, proof arrives as numbers. In startups, proof shows up as decisions. Enterprise feedback arrives filtered and quarterly; startup impact is immediate. Doubt slows deals. Confidence speeds them up. Immediacy forces clarity. You take fewer performative bets. You stop optimizing for presentations. You design to remove doubt. Because you’re not defending slides — you’re shaping what happens next.

12

12 Comments

This hit close to home. This quarter we've been actively rethinking our design process. Removing rituals, pulling back on some discovery activities, and prioritizing speed and learning over craft and critique. It can be uncomfortable but it's the right direction. This episode puts a lot of it into words.

26

6 Comments

DesignOps value is built on creating rhythm, trust, and clarity. Too often, brilliant ICs are promoted—and left to “lead” alone. They keep shipping, but now under pressure. The scope grows. The mentorship fades. The systems don’t adapt. Deadlines slip. Collaboration erodes. Attrition rises. And still, we think: “We just need stronger leads.” But that’s not the answer. Because… • Micromanagement is not mentorship. • Feedback that only happens in a crisis is too late. • A single designer holding everything together isn’t a hero—it’s a risk. DesignOps, at its best, builds the scaffolding that makes leadership sustainable. It’s the weekly rituals that surface blockers early. The feedback habits that normalize growth. The cultural cues that reward mentorship, not martyrdom. Because great leadership often looks invisible—until it’s missing. What helps: • Preparing people before promoting them. • Creating clear rhythms that support judgment, not just speed. • Measuring impact not by what leaders ship, but by what they unlock. Design doesn’t just need stronger individuals. It needs stronger systems. Systems that scale trust, build clarity, and let creative leadership thrive. What has helped you make the leap from maker to leader? Would love to hear how others are approaching this. #DesignLeadership #DesignOps #UX #OrgDesign #Mentorship #CreativeLeadership

13

3 Comments

A lot of this reflects my own personal view of how the design process is changing, and its effects on the archetypes of designers needed for the next chapter

19

Leveling up your design career means improving in three areas: AI tools: Assembling an evolving AI design stack to ship fast — My stack: Cursor, v0, Prismic, Magic Patterns — AI fluency: Learning how to design for unpredictable systems Human-advantage: Strengthening moats like craft, agency and judgment to stay ahead of automation Together with strategic thinking and human-centric skills, these pillars shape your path toward becoming an AI-native designer. #design #architect #AI

1

I’ve been thinking a lot about this idea that “design systems are dead.” I don’t think that’s true. But I also think they need to evolve. As AI makes it easier to build software, we’re going to see a flood of products that all look the same. Clean UI. Decent UX. Fully functional. but all very generic. When everyone can generate a working app, execution alone stops being the advantage. That’s where design starts to matter more, not less. Not design as screens or components, but design as judgment. What to build. What not to build. How things connect. Where to create friction and where to remove it. Design systems aren’t the problem. They’ve just become normalized. The real question is how they evolve when AI is one of the builders. AI needs clearer constraints than humans do. Stronger rules. Less ambiguity. Maybe the future of design systems isn’t about enforcing consistency, but about defining intent, decision trees, boundaries, and room for exploration. what do you think? where do you see design systems going? #Design #DesignSystems #AIinDesign #ProductDesign #UXDesign #FutureOfWork #CreativeTechnology

51

11 Comments