Carla Crull

📊 Breaking Down MSP/VMS Program Structures: A Suppliers Perspective on What We Really See and Feel About Common Program Structures Currently, we’ve partnered across multiple enterprise contingent workforce programs and have seen five common program structures shape how suppliers perform. Each brings clear benefits—but also challenges that directly impact speed-to-fill, candidate quality, and overall partnership. Here’s some pros and cons I’ve seen first hand from each: 🔹 1. Vendor-Neutral • Pro: Creates a level playing field where all suppliers compete on speed, compliance, and quality. Provides a competitive environment to provide quality talent. • Con: Can become very transactional—51% of suppliers in SIA’s survey cited “lack of feedback/context” as the biggest pain point in vendor-neutral setups. Without feedback it can be hard to make improvements to talent quality. 🔹 2. No Hiring Manager Contact • Pro: Protects hiring manager bandwidth and enforces consistent processes; ensures suppliers funnel everything through the MSP or Internally Managed Team. • Con: Cuts off valuable feedback loops. In fact, LinkedIn data shows candidates are 38% more likely to drop out when communication lacks context about the company or leadership they’re being hired by. 🔹 3. Master Vendor / Vendor-Exclusive • Pro: Centralized communication, faster decisions, and deep program knowledge. Less mess when it comes to contacting and working with supplier base. • Con: Over-reliance on one partner can limit competition, and create unhealthy reliance on a partner that may not be meeting all your labor needs. SIA notes 71% of enterprises worry about cost inflation in exclusive setups. 🔹 4. Hybrid / Tiered Supplier Model • Pro: Balances competition—core tier suppliers drive consistency, compliance, and proven results, while Tier 2 and beyond provide flexibility and niche skill coverage when Tier 1 suppliers aren’t as effective. • Con: Tier 2+ suppliers often feel disadvantaged; without proper calibration and consistent requisition flow, the majority of reqs can skew heavily toward Tier 1. This can create disengagement, where lower-tier suppliers stop investing resources because they see limited to zero ROI in program participation. 🔹 5. Direct Sourcing / Talent Pools • Pro: 74% of enterprises now view direct sourcing as a key strategy to cut cost-per-hire and reduce time-to-fill. Alumni and silver-medalist talent pools are game changers. • Con: Requires significant investment in employer brand + tech, and traditional suppliers are still critical for niche roles or functioning as an EOR/Payrolling partner in the backend. ✨ From the supplier side, not one of these models is “perfect.” The strongest programs are those that balance compliance, speed, and quality, while treating suppliers as partners with a win-win relationship—not just vendors that eat what they can catch. #ContingentWorkforce #MSP #VMS #StaffingSupplierPerspective #WorkforceSolutions

6